A bitter High Court dispute has broken out in between potential neighbours in excess of the development of the wall at a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a situation which includes attracted nationwide consideration subsequent an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed spouse and children dwelling at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental considerations, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier along with the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has advanced right into a remarkably publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of building performs at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, seek out to construct their spouse and children house. The situation happens to be emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of recognized inhabitants. Based on the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining constructed by their possible neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted less than arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two citizens of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their scheduling permission by developing a wall beyond the boundaries of their internet site, leading to an encroachment on a Distinctive Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as such parts are issue to stringent controls below European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments might have lasting ecological repercussions, significantly inside a delicate coastal environment for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, that's partially built, is in the proper placement. Their legal team has characterised the action as an attempt to hold off or frustrate a lawful advancement. The couple accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding in an effort to protect their see, an allegation that's been repeated in court docket and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal scheduling disputes, exactly where sights of the sea are each extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable endeavours via the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In line with sworn evidence referenced from the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded via waist-significant drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Situations, an image which has considering the fact that come to be emblematic of the intensity from the dispute. These steps weren't merely symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible proof in the wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site within the sea Irish Instances reported, describing how The 2 men entered the water through critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm drinking water to photograph the location turned The most putting descriptions to arise from courtroom reporting. The Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this kind of actions have been cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ belief the wall extended into a location influenced by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was staying encroached upon.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been included in detail via the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as visitors sought to be aware of the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to additional submissions on no matter whether interim orders need to be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key instant within the lawful timeline.
With the core from the dispute can be a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain that the wall, as produced, goes over and above what was authorized and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has actually been called meticulous in his examination of setting up documents, maps, and conditions connected to the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their action is enthusiastic by concern for environmental safety and adherence to setting up law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving a private watch, insisting instead that it is about making certain that advancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have got explained their extended-standing link to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a pair simply just wanting to establish a family members household in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny the wall encroaches on a Particular Area of Conservation and say that all performs happen to be completed based on Skilled tips and accredited designs. Their lawyers have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the extraordinary actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include getting into the sea throughout a storm, don't alter the fundamental points.
The case has also Paul Feely and René Collier raised broader questions on how planning disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute about construction of wall at coastal web site has become a shorthand description for just a predicament that a lot of observers see as more and more popular. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation in between personal land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is now much more contentious.
The Irish Periods post about René Collier pointed out which the businessman had Beforehand been involved in local advocacy on planning and environmental troubles, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from pretty different Expert backgrounds can find themselves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website through the sea Irish Situations protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-higher h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Periods and René Collier waded via waistline-substantial drinking water through a storm to photograph the location Irish Periods are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both equally the Bodily reality of your coastline along with the symbolic character with the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an extreme approach.
Since the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome stays uncertain. The courtroom will have to decide if the wall as designed complies with preparing permission and irrespective of whether any encroachment into a Unique Place of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and scheduling conditions. Yet the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who need to live together with each other very long following the legal costs are actually paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design will work at the website on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the case prolong further than that deal with. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the necessity of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how immediately a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when basic concerns for example environmental security and home rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains a place of all-natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre on the dispute stands partially designed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. No matter whether it's going to ultimately be altered, taken out, or completed as planned will count on the court docket’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to one of the most closely watched scheduling disputes in north Dublin in recent years.